Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE 250
RAM PIARI STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET
Present: Ms. Mehak Singh
Mr. Padmakant Dwivedi, Advocate for
Mr.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)
1.
The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India in the nature of mandamus for direction to the respondents to release the 33% arrears of revised salary of the petitioner, in terms of 4 arrears of revised pay w.e.f. 01.09.2009 till 30.04.2012 i.e. the of retirement of the petitioner, in view of recommendations made by 5th Pay Commission duly adopted by the respondent
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition as grievance raised by the petitione has substantially been redressed and the has been rendered infructuous.
3.
Dismissed as withdrawn having been rendered infructuous.
09.09.2025 NainaRajput
Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 09.09.2025
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET Ms. Mehak Singh, Advocate for Mr. Padmakant Dwivedi, Advocate for Mr. Akhil Kamra, AAG Punjab for the State HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed under Articles the Constitution of India in the nature of mandamus for direction to the respondents to release the 33% arrears of revised salary of the petitioner, in terms of 4th arrears of revised pay w.e.f. 01.09.2009 till 30.04.2012 i.e. the of retirement of the petitioner, in view of recommendations made by Pay Commission duly adopted by the respondent
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition as grievance raised by the petitione has substantially been redressed and the has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as withdrawn having been rendered
.09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-23497-2022 Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 ….PETITIONER ….RSPONDETNS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR , Advocate for Mr. Padmakant Dwivedi, Advocate for the petitioner. Punjab for the State. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles the Constitution of India in the nature of mandamus for direction to the respondents to release the 33% arrears of revised Pay Commission along with arrears of revised pay w.e.f. 01.09.2009 till 30.04.2012 i.e. the date of retirement of the petitioner, in view of recommendations made by Pay Commission duly adopted by the respondent-Board.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition as grievance raised by the petitioner has substantially been redressed and therefore, the present petition Dismissed as withdrawn having been rendered (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No
….PETITIONER
NS
The present writ petition has been filed under Articles the Constitution of India in the nature of mandamus for direction to the respondents to release the 33% arrears of revised along with date of retirement of the petitioner, in view of recommendations made by
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to r present petition Dismissed as withdrawn having been rendered (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) NAINA KATHIAT 2025.09.10 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document