HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 28709 of 2025 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh holding brief of Sri Santosh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and Sri Akhilesh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2. 2. This petition has been filed by the applicants for quashing the entire proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No.54 of 2024 (State Vs. Nadeem) and cognizance order dated 27.6.2024 passed by Special Judge POCSO Act/Additional Sessions Judge, Sambhal at Chandausi along with charge sheet No.125 of 2024 dated 6.6.2024 arising out of case crime No.91 of 2024 under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and under Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, police station Dhanari, District Sambhal. 3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that parties have amicably compromised their dispute, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court below. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the Court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the parties to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 7. Original copy of compromise, if filed before this Court along with the present application, be returned to the learned counsel for applicants, as per Rules of Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Gupta, Shubham Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Akhilesh Tripathi, G.A. Nadeem .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 8. With aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of. September 18, 2025 RKM. NA528 No. 28709 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad