Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83487 (PNJ)

SALEEM SHAH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8133/2025 · 2025-07-31

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-8133 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 111 Saleem Shah State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondents No. 1 and 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner as well as the property of Dera Takiya Baba Bharpur Shah from the hands of the private respondents. 2. has submitted that 23.06.2025 to respondent No. 2 grievances as raised in the present petition but no action has been taken so far. It is further submitted that appropriate direction is issued to representation and take necessary action. 3. 4. accepts notice on shall be done in due course. 8133-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Saleem Shah Versus Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Anil Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondents and 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner as well as the property of Dera Takiya Baba Bharpur Shah from the hands of the private respondents. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner s submitted that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 23.06.2025 to respondent No. 2-Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana raising his grievances as raised in the present petition but no action has been taken so far. It is further submitted that at this stage, th appropriate direction is issued to respondent No. 2 representation and take necessary action. Notice of motion. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, P accepts notice on behalf of the respondent shall be done in due course. - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8133-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 31.07.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondents and 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner as well as the property of Dera Takiya Baba Bharpur Shah from the hands of the private After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioner has submitted a representation dated Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana raising his grievances as raised in the present petition but no action has been taken so far. at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, behalf of the respondent-State and submits that the needful -1- (O&M) 31.07.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondents and 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner as well as the property of Dera Takiya Baba Bharpur Shah from the hands of the private After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioner has submitted a representation dated Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana raising his grievances as raised in the present petition but no action has been taken so far. e petitioner would be satisfied if to decide the aforesaid who is present in Court, State and submits that the needful MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.08.01 09:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8133 5. present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 Commissioner of Police, Ludhian submitted by the petitioner within a period of passing a speakin so required. the life and liberty of the petitioner. 31.07.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 8133-2025 (O&M) Keeping in view the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to decide the submitted by the petitioner within a period of passing a speaking order in accordance with law and take necessary action, if so required. In the meantime, the official respondents are directe the life and liberty of the petitioner. 31.07.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable - Keeping in view the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid representation submitted by the petitioner within a period of one month from today by g order in accordance with law and take necessary action, if In the meantime, the official respondents are directed to protect (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No -2- Keeping in view the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2- aforesaid representation month from today by g order in accordance with law and take necessary action, if d to protect MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.08.01 09:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document