Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83485 (KAR)

THE MANAGER v. SMT PARAVATHAMMA

MFA/110/2023 · 2025-12-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL & SRI. M.N. UMASHANKAR, MEMBER M.F.A.No.110/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.8887/2025) BETWEEN 1 . THE MANAGER, BAJAJ ALLIANZ GIC LTD., NO.11335/A.C.D. BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, PANCHAMANTRA ROAD, KUVEMPUNAGARA, CHAMARAJ MOHALLA, MYSURU - 570023 NOW REP. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, M/S. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GIC LTD., NO.1/2, GOLDEN HEIGHTS, 4TH FLOOR, 59TH C CROSS, 4TH M BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 10. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRADEEP B., ADVOCATE) 2 AND 1 . SMT. PARAVATHAMMA, W/O. PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT YELAKKUR VILLAGE, MATADA STREET, HEGGAVADI POST, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT. 2 . SMT. MAMATHA, W/O. PRASANNA C.M., AGED 28 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKA KOWLANDE VILLAGE, NANJANAGUD TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT. 3 . SRI. VEDITH N. RAJ, S/O. NAVEEN RAJ N., AGED 36 YEARS, R/AT VEDHAVATHI NILAYA, BEHIND NES COLONY, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571105. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SYED ABDUL SABOOR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 30.09.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.1097/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MACT, MYSURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.23,99,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL DEPOSIT. 3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – claimant Nos.1 and 2 is present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the respondent Nos.1 and 2/claimant Nos.1 and 2 (being authorized by the respondent Nos.1 and 2/claimant Nos.1 and 2 to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the Appellant - Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The respondent Nos.1 and 2/claimant Nos.1 and 2 have agreed to receive and the Appellant - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.21,65,000/- (Rupees Twenty One Lakh Sixty Five Thousand only) with interest at 6% p.a. instead of Rs.23,99,000/- with interest @ 6% p.a. awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Appellant - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of 4 award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. The amount if any, deposited before this Court shall be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the modified compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER ABK