APHC010089352013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 35317/2013 Between: 1. S. NANDAN RAO, S/ O. VENKATA RATNAM, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC: FOUNDRY BUSINESS, R/O. LAKSHMIVARIPET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. A P INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORP LTD REP BY ITS VICE, CHAIRMAN & MG.DIRECTOR PARISHRAM BHAVAN, BASHEERBAGH,HYDERABAD. 3. ELURU TOWN AUTOMOBILE MECHANICS ASSOCIATION, MALKAPURAM, OPP. ASHRAM HOSPITAL, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP BY ITS SECRETARY Y.RAMAKRISHNA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned circular No.296/ DW/ 2000 dt.19.03.2000 issued by 2nd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional besides contrary to Rule of Law and consequently set aside the impugned circular No.296/ DW/ 2000 dt.19.03.2000 by directing the 2nd respondent to initiate action pursuant to enquiry report dt.25.10.2013 submitted against 3rd respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 43892 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of impugned circular No.296/ DW/ 2000 dt.19.03.2000 issued by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 45593 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the additional affidavit filed in W.P.No. 35317 of 2013 IA NO: 5 OF 2013(WPMP 193814 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEEPIKA GADDE 2. P ROY REDDY 3. GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 03.07.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 04.07.2025 IKN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 35317 of 2013 Date: 04.07.2025 IKN