Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8347 (MAD)

BRIGHT ADVERTISING v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/33386/2025 · 2026-07-14

Hemant Chandangoudar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 33386 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WP No. 33386 of 2025 Bright Advertising A Registered Partnership Firm, Rep By its Authorised Signatory (Authorization Dated 2.8.2025) Mohan Kumar P. S/o.Perumal, Having Office At No.13, Moores Road, Moores Garden, Thousand Lights Chennai-600 006 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Commissioner Tambaram Corporation, Tambaram, Chengalpet-600 045 ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 21.6.2025 and pay a sum of Rs.16,14,764/-(Rupees Sixteen Lakh Fourteen Thousand and Seven Hundred and Sixty Four Only) together with interest at 18% per annum on Rs.16,14,764/- to the petitioner within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr. C.S.Sai Krishnan For Respondent: Mr.M.Sivavarthanan, Govt.Counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 33386 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction to the respondent to consider the representation dated 21.06.2025, whereby the petitioner has called upon the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.16,14,764/- together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. 2. The petitioner states that it has been one of the Government of Tamil Nadu’s recognised empanelled advertising agencies since 1990. It is further stated that the respondent had entrusted the petitioner with the publication of specified advertisements in both English and Tamil dailies. 3. According to the petitioner, it published 38 advertisements in the English dailies and thereafter raised invoices in accordance with the rates prescribed by the Government of Tamil Nadu. As per the terms of the engagement, the respondent was required to make payment within four weeks from the date of submission of the bills. However, the respondent has failed to make payment in terms of the invoices. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 21.06.2025 calling upon the respondent to settle the outstanding amount, but the same has not yet been considered. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 33386 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondent, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 21.06.2025 would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed on its own merits within the time frame fixed by this Court. 5. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Counsel, the respondent is directed to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 21.06.2025 on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 14-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ak To The Commissioner Tambaram Corporation, Tambaram, Chengalpet-600 045 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 33386 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. ak WP No. 33386 of 2025 14-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis