Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8346 (RAJ)

PRAHLAD AND ORS v. STATE BANK OF INDIA

CW/10250/2007 · 2025-04-04

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:15312] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10250/2007 1. Prahlad S/o Ramdhan aged about 58 yaers 2. Dropti W/o Panna Lal aged about 55 years 3. Dhakha W/o Ramdhan aged about 80 years 4. Rampati W/o Shyam Lal aged about 57 years 5. Vimla W/o Manohar Lal Aged about 45 years All are R/o Mannoj Tehsil Todabhim Distt. Karauli Raj ----Petitioners Versus State Bank Of India through its Branch Manager Bhusawat Distt. Bharatpur Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Fahad Hasan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 04/04/2025 Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted a copy of the loan account for perusal of the Court. The same is taken on record. Referring to the aforesaid statement of the account, learned counsel for the respondent submits that loan account of the petitioner has been closed on account of settlement between the parties and this writ petition is rendered infructuous. None appears for the petitioners even in second round to rebut the aforesaid statement. None was present on their behalf on last date as well, i.e., 26.03.2025. In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/44