112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8024-2025 DECIDED ON: 28.07.2025 NAVDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr.Rahul Noorie, Advocate and Mr. Ajay Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. TPS Walia, Addl.A.G, Punjab. **** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the petitioners. Learned State Counsel has submitted that a speaking order has already been passed in the representation dated 22.07.2025 (Annexure P-7) by the authorities concerned and has produced the copy of the same, which is taken on record. He has furnished a copy of the order to counsel for the petitioners. The relevant part of the speaking order is reproduced below :- ‘It is requested that the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, had filed a writ petition No. CRWP 8024-2025 by Navdeep Anuradha 2025.07.28 22:41 I agree to specified portions of this document CRWP-8024-2025 2 kaur Daughter of Baljinder Singh, resident of village Paheri, PS Amloh. Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab now residing at Care of Narinder Singh son of Gurmail singh resident of village Tanda badha, PS Amloh, Fatehgarh Sahib, For Protection against her Baljinder singh son of Nikka Singh, her Balwinder kaur wife of Baljinder sing and her Jaspreet kaur Daughter of Baljinder singh. Regarding Private respondent party called at police post bugga kalan (Ps police station) for investigation. Private respondent party Baljinder singh, Balwinder kaur, gave their statement that our daughter navdeep kaur was married to narinder Singh son of gurmail singh village Tanda badha, We have no objection or any issue on this marriage. Navdeep kaur can live with Narinder Singh with her free will and During investigation, ASI Tararnjit singh Ic/pp Bugga kalan found that Petitioner Party Narinder Singh, Navdeep Kaur are not living at village Tanda badha that is verified by Sarpanch Tanda badha Balvir singh. Whenever it is known about the safety of Navdeep kaur and ors. they will be provided with necessary security.’ In light of the above, counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this petition further. The petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure, in the light of notification No.HOMEHM-40 40SECM/14/2025-2H4/63 dated 23.01.2025 issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government of Punjab (Home-4 Branch)., in case of any grievance left after passing of the speaking order. Petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 28.07.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No Anuradha 2025.07.28 22:41 I agree to specified portions of this document