Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:5532 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
C528/971/2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. T.C. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Vikash Uniyal along with Mr. Prabhat Kanpdal, learned Brief Holders for the State.
3. Present petition under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicant to quash the impugned charge sheet, summoning/cognizance order dated 13.08.2021, passed in Criminal Case No. 321 by the learned 2nd Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division)/Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar as well as entire proceedings of the aforesaid criminal case.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in Government Primary School, Tantwala, Bahadrabad, District Haridwar in the year 2008. Subsequently, in 2012, she was promoted to the post of Head Mistress. He would further submit that at the time of appointment, all the requisite documents were submitted by the applicant, which were duly verified by the competent School Education Authorities of the State.
5. He would further submit that based on an anonymous complaint alleging that the applicant had secured employment through forged certificates, the Education Department referred the matter to the Special Investigation Team (SIT), Dehradun. Consequently, the Deputy Education Officer (Elementary Education), Haridwar/respondent terminated the services of the applicant on the ground that the applicant secured the employment on the basis of forged documents.
6.
Learned counsel for the applicant would further submit that the termination order was
2025:UHC:5532 passed without granting the applicant an opportunity of hearing and against the said termination, the applicant has filed a special appeal, which is currently pending consideration before the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court.
7.
Learned counsel would further submit that the applicant is ready to surrender before the concerned trial court and makes innocuous prayer that a direction be issued to the court below to decide the bail application of the applicant as expeditiously preferably on the same day of its filing.
8. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.
9. In view of the aforesaid facts and
submissions, the applicant is directed to surrender before the court concerned within 15 days from today and file her bail application before the concerned trial court. The trial court is
directed to consider and decide the said bail application in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably on the same day of its filing.
10. Accordingly, the present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. stands disposed of.
11. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
30.06.2025 Mamta
2025:UHC:5532