- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27899 WP No. 10364 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10364 OF 2023 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RAMAMURTHY S/O. LATE. VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RETIRED AS GROUP D EMPLOYEE TUMKUR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TUMKUR-572103 RESIDING AT AREGUJJANNA HALLI URDIGERE, TUMKUR-572140. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATISH K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. TUMKUR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER BELAGUMBA ROAD, TUMAKURU-572103. 3. THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E) PARK HOUSE ROAD, P.B. NO.5329 BANGALORE-560001. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27899 WP No. 10364 of 2023 (BY SRI. VIKAS ROJIPURA, AGA FOR R1 & R3: SRI. T P VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS DIRECT THE R2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED: 23.12.2022 AND 27.03.2023 (ANNEXURE-L AND M) AND TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR REGULARIZATION AND REGULARIZE HIS SERVICE IN THE CADRE OF GROUP-D FROM THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF 10 YEARS OF SERVICE AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR EARLY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner sought for a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to consider the representations dated 23.12.2022 and 27.03.2023 vide Annexures - L and M, respectively. 2. Today, the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 has filed a memo enclosing the endorsement dated 24.04.2025 issued by respondent No.2 after considering the said representations. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27899 WP No. 10364 of 2023 3. In view of the above, the prayers sought in this writ petition do not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the endorsement dated 24.04.2025 issued by respondent No.2, in accordance with law. 4. All contentions of the parties are left open. 5. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending I.As., if any, are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 44