Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83436 (PNJ)

NARENDER KUMAR v. DINESH RANA AND ANR

FAO/7611/2017 · 2025-02-07

Lok Adalat Bench

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DAILY LOK ADALAT 506 Present: by the learned tribunal and the Insurance Company was directed to pay compensation reserving its right to owner & driver. However, learned counsel for the appellant states that a compromise has been effected between the owner, driver and the Insurance Company as recorded by the learned MACT vide order dated 20.07.2021. In terms of com to be paid by the Insurance Company and no liability can be fastened upon the owner & driver of the offending vehicle. Driver/owner of the offending vehicle ha and the same is disposed of accordingly. 07.02.202 NainaRajput DAILY LOK ADALAT FAO-7611-2017 NARENDER KUMAR V/S DINESH RANA & ANR. Mr. UK Agnihotri, Advocate with Mr. AK Agnihotri, Advocate for the appellant-Driver/Owner Mr. Yashveer Kharb, Advocate for the respondent/claimant. Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for Bajaj Allianz GIC * * * * Liability in this case was fastened by the learned tribunal and the Insurance Company was directed to pay compensation reserving its right to owner & driver. However, learned counsel for the appellant states that a compromise has been effected between the owner, driver and the Insurance Company as recorded by the learned MACT vide order dated 20.07.2021. In terms of compromise, the enhanced amount, if any to be paid by the Insurance Company and no liability can be fastened upon the owner & driver of the offending vehicle. In view of the above, the present appeal filed by the owner of the offending vehicle ha and the same is disposed of accordingly. ( 2.2025 BENCH NO.3 NARENDER KUMAR V/S DINESH RANA & ANR. Mr. UK Agnihotri, Advocate with /Owner. Mr. Yashveer Kharb, Advocate for the Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for Bajaj Allianz GIC Liability in this case was fastened upon the owner & driver by the learned tribunal and the Insurance Company was directed to pay compensation reserving its right to recover the same from the owner & driver. However, learned counsel for the appellant states that a compromise has been effected between the owner, driver and the Insurance Company as recorded by the learned MACT vide order dated promise, the enhanced amount, if any, is to be paid by the Insurance Company and no liability can be fastened upon the owner & driver of the offending vehicle. , the present appeal filed by the owner of the offending vehicle has been rendered infructuous (G.C. GARG) PRESIDENT (MAHAVIR SINGH CHAUHAN) MEMBER upon the owner & driver by the learned tribunal and the Insurance Company was directed to recover the same from the owner & driver. However, learned counsel for the appellant states that a compromise has been effected between the owner, driver and the Insurance Company as recorded by the learned MACT vide order dated is to be paid by the Insurance Company and no liability can be fastened , the present appeal filed by the s been rendered infructuous G.C. GARG) PRESIDENT ) MEMBER NAINA KATHIAT 2025.02.11 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document