Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8343 (JHR)

VINAY SHARMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2417/2025 · 2025-04-21

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:11897 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2417 of 2025 ------ Vinay Sharma, son of Bhola Sharma, resident of Village Chandih, P.O. Kharagdiha, P.S. Jamua, District Giridih, Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ... ... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Ravidas, Advocate Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, A.P.P. ----- 04/ 21.04.2025 This Anticipatory Bail Application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Deori P.S. Case No.68 of 2024, for offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2) IPC, Section 30(ii) of the Coal Mines Act and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Giridih. 2. Heard the parties at length. 3. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application. 4. The petitioner is the owner of the vehicle which was transporting illegally mined coal. 5. Considering the allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner as there is nothing on record to suggest that there is any apprehension of the petitioner being arrested. 2025:JHHC:11897 2 6. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed. 7. If the petitioner surrenders before the Court below, his case will be considered in terms of judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in 2022 (10) SCC 51 as well as Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in 2024 (9) SCC 198. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3