Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010042252025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/497/2025 SAHID AHMED S/O ALI AHMED BORBHIYA VIL-BORJARAPUR, P.S.BORKHOLA DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:KANCHAN KUMAR DEB S/O LATE MANORANJAN DEB
R/O CENTRAL JAIL QUARTER SILCHAR P.O. AND P.S.SILCHAR Advocate for the Petitioner : MS G K DAS, M BORO Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. M ACHARYYA(R-2),MR B ACHARYYA (R- 2),MS. M K BROWN, Amicus Curiae, (R-2)
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 29.04.2025 Heard Ms. G.K. Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State respondent and Ms. M.K. Brown, learned Amicus Curiae appearing for the respondent No.2/informant. It appears that the instant interlocutory bail application arises out of an offence under sub-section 2 of section 17 of the BNSS, 2023. It appears that under section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, an interlocutory bail application does not lie in cases where the arrest of the person involves acquisition of having committed an offence under sub-section 2 of section 17 of BNSS, 2023 amongst other. That being so, the instant interlocutory bail application is not maintainable. At this stage, Ms. G.K. Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the instant interlocutory bail application. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the instant interlocutory bail application stand dismissed on being withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant