Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83413 (PNJ)

DALBIR SINGH v. SURJAN SINGH AND OTHERS

RA-CR/106/2025 · 2025-08-07

Amarinder Singh Grewal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 122 Dalbir Singh Surjan Singh and others CORAM : HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. S.L. Chander Shekhar, Advocate for the applicant *** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL 1. The present review application has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 CPC for recalling of the order dated 10.07.2025 passed by this Court as due to inadvertence, point E to J has been omitted to be mentioned in the aforesaid order, as mentioned in the 2. Learned counsel for the review applicant/petitioner submits that in the fifth line of first paragraph of the order dated 10.07.2025, inadvertently, words ‘point A to D and F to J’ have been typed whereas it ought to have been ‘poi D and E to J’, as mentioned in the execution application. 3. It is an obvious clerical mistake and therefore, the same is ordered to be corrected. The words ‘point A to D and F to J’ in the fifth line of first paragraph of the order dated 10.07. is directed to carry out necessary correction in the order dated 10.07.2025. 4. The review application stands allowed in above terms. August 07, 2025 Pankaj* IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CR- Date of Decision: Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. S.L. Chander Shekhar, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. *** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) The present review application has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 CPC for recalling of the order dated 10.07.2025 passed by this Court as due to inadvertence, point E to J has been omitted to be mentioned in the aforesaid order, as mentioned in the execution petition. Learned counsel for the review applicant/petitioner submits that in the fifth line of first paragraph of the order dated 10.07.2025, inadvertently, words ‘point A to D and F to J’ have been typed whereas it ought to have been ‘poi D and E to J’, as mentioned in the execution application. It is an obvious clerical mistake and therefore, the same is ordered to be corrected. The words ‘point A to D and F to J’ in the fifth line of first paragraph of the order dated 10.07.2025 be read as words ‘point A to D and E to J’. Registry is directed to carry out necessary correction in the order dated 10.07.2025. The review application stands allowed in above terms. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -106 of 2025 in CR No.3424-2025 Date of Decision:07.08.2025 ... Applicant/petitioner ... Respondent AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. S.L. Chander Shekhar, Advocate , J. (ORAL) The present review application has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 CPC for recalling of the order dated 10.07.2025 passed by this Court as due to inadvertence, point E to J has been omitted to be mentioned in the aforesaid Learned counsel for the review applicant/petitioner submits that in the fifth line of first paragraph of the order dated 10.07.2025, inadvertently, words ‘point A to D and F to J’ have been typed whereas it ought to have been ‘point A to D and E to J’, as mentioned in the execution application. It is an obvious clerical mistake and therefore, the same is ordered to be corrected. The words ‘point A to D and F to J’ in the fifth line of first paragraph 2025 be read as words ‘point A to D and E to J’. Registry is directed to carry out necessary correction in the order dated 10.07.2025. The review application stands allowed in above terms. AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 Applicant/petitioner ... Respondents The present review application has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 CPC for recalling of the order dated 10.07.2025 passed by this Court as due to inadvertence, point E to J has been omitted to be mentioned in the aforesaid Learned counsel for the review applicant/petitioner submits that in the fifth line of first paragraph of the order dated 10.07.2025, inadvertently, words nt A to It is an obvious clerical mistake and therefore, the same is ordered to be corrected. The words ‘point A to D and F to J’ in the fifth line of first paragraph 2025 be read as words ‘point A to D and E to J’. Registry AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.08.11 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh