RICHHPAL SINGH v. PUNJAB COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD
CRM-M/40713/2025 · 2025-09-08
Sumeet Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83391 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83391 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(143)
CRM-M-40713-2025 Decided on : 08.09.2025 Richhpal Singh ……Petitioner(s) Versus Primary Cooperative Agriculture Development Bank Ltd.
……Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: None for the petitioner.
***** Sumeet Goel (Oral):
1.
Case has been called twice since morning, but none has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner in support of the petition. Office note indicates that notice to respondent could not be issued for want of process fee. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the present petition.
2.
Ergo, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE September 08, 2025 Naveen
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.09.08 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh