Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8339 (JHR)

DHUMO MANDI ALIAS DHUMA MANDI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1877/2025 · 2025-03-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 1877 of 2025 1. Dhumo Mandi @ Dhuma Mandi aged about- 57 years, S/o- Lapsa Mandi, 2. Sukulmani Mandi aged about- 55 years, w/o- Ghuma Mandi, 3. Diba Mandi @ Robin Mandi aged about 29 years, s/o- Sukul Mandi, All R/o- Laobera, P.O- Kalapathra, P.S- Chakulia, Dist- East Singhbhm, Jharkhand. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. S.Baroi , Adv. For the State : Ms. Bandana Sinha, Addl.. PP 02 / 25.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Chakulia P.S case No. 73/2024 registered under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/109/352/351(3)/3(5) of B.N.S,. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the mother of the informant and caused grievous injury to her. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is inordinate delay of 12 days in lodging the FIR and due to village enmity, this false case has been foisted. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant, victim or their family members in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M, Ghatshila. in connection with Chakulia P.S case No. 73/2024 subject to the condition that the petitioners will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or their family members in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-