Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107265 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7747 of 2024 Applicant :- Anmol Chaouhan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Kunwar Abhishek Singh,Suresh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohammad Khalid Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. List has been revised. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant. 2. Heard Mr. Mohammad Khalid, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The present anticipatory bail application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 0278 of 2024, under Sections 420, 409, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Chandpur, District Bijnor, with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the first informant states that anticipatory bail application of co-accused namely, Vishal Kumar has been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 26.05.2025 in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 10157 of 2024 (Vishal Kumar Vs. State of U.P.). He prays that the present anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant may also be dismissed by this Court since the case of the present applicant is identical to that of the co-accused. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by counsel for the first informant. 5. It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration. 6. In the instant case, considering the settled principle of law regarding anticipatory bail, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, nature of accusation, role of applicant and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, no case for anticipatory bail is made out. 7. The anticipatory bail application is rejected. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 AS Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad