Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8336 (PAT)

Parvez @ Pravez v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./5316/2025 · 2025-03-17

Chandra Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5316 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2022 Thana- KOCHADHAMAN District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Parvez @ Pravez Son of Younesh @ Yunus Resident of Village- Dalmapur, P.S.- Amaur, District- Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 17-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 38/2022 dated 03.02.2022 registered for the offence punishable u/s 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, 5-6 unknown miscreants armed with pistol, lathi, iron rod, spade, axe and khanti entered the house of the informant and looted cash, silver and gold ornaments on the point of weapons and fled away from there after exploding bomb and firing. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5316 of 2025(2) dt.17-03-2025 2/3 this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused persons, Md. Mustafa and Lal Babu. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 01.09.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27049/2022. The petitioner has five antecedents and he is on bail in all the aforesaid cases as stated in Supplementary Affidavit. The petitioner is in custody since 08.10.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Kishanganj in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 38/2022, with the condition ;- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5316 of 2025(2) dt.17-03-2025 3/3 cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled. 7. The application stands allowed. atul/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T