Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133406 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8660 of 2025 Petitioner :- Poonam Rai Respondent :- Sunita And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Pravesh Yadav,Shashank Kumar Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"To exercise it powers of superintendence as enshrined under Article 227 of the constitution of India to direct Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghazipur to decide Application 6-C filed by the petitioner in Original Suit no. 287 of 2025 (Poonam Rai Vs. Sunita Rai and others) preferably on the next date fixed and the said Suit be also decided expeditiously within a period as stipulated by this Hon'ble court, after giving opportunity of hearing to both side in accordance with law."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghazipur to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad