Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83352 (PNJ)

SANJEEV KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

RA-CW/318/2025 · 2025-07-31

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RA-CW-318-2025 IN CWP-28635-2024 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 106 RA-CW-318-2025 IN CWP-28635-2024. Date of Decision: 31.07.2025. SANJEEV KUMAR ... non-applicant-petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... Review-applicants-respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel, for the review applicants-respondents. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) RA-CW-318-2025 IN CWP-28635-2024 The present review application under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been filed on behalf of the respondents with a prayer to review the order dated 26.05.2025 passed in CWP-28635-2024. RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.01 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RA-CW-318-2025 IN CWP-28635-2024 -2- I have heard the learned counsel for the review applicants/respondents at length. Counsel for the review applicants/respondents intends to argue a matter which has already been decided on merits under the garb of review. Learned counsel has also not been able to point out any illegality or latent/patent defect in the order but is only pointing out the hardships which might emanate therefrom. No ground is made to review the order dated 26.05.2025. The present review application is thus dismissed. Since the review application itself has been dismissed, misc. applications (CM-10477-CWP-2025 and CM-10478-CWP-2025) are also accordingly dismissed. July 31, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.01 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document