SURJEET SINGH @ ANKIT v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
CRLR/3896/2024 · 2025-09-23
Madan Pal Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3896 of 2024 Court No. - 91 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J.
1. Sri Mahendra Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Jitendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist states that he does not wish to press the present criminal revision and, therefore, prays that the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the revisionist, the present criminal is dismissed as not pressed.
3. This order has passed in the presence of learned AGA for the State. September 24, 2025 Akbar Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Amrita Verma, Avanish Kumar Agnihotri, J Shubham, Jitendra Kumar Mishra, Praveen Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Madan Pal Singh,J.) Surjeet Singh @ Ankit .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKBAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad