Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83342 (ALL)

RAGHUVENDRA RAGHAV v. JAIPAL SINGH AND ANOTHER

A227/8659/2025 · 2025-08-06

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133397 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8659 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raghuvendra Raghav Respondent :- Jaipal Singh And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Singh,Kunwar Bhaskar Parihar Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "To issue a order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gautam Budh Nagar to decide the 6C2 application dated 24.1.2025 within stipulated time in suit no. 37 of 2025." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C2 Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gautam Budh Nagar to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C2 Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad