Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8333 (PAT)

Arjun Sah @ Arjun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

CR. MISC./955/2025 · 2025-02-11

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.955 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2024 Thana- JIRADEI District- Siwan ====================================================== Arjun Sah @ Arjun Kumar S/O Parmeshwar Sah Village- Thepahan Bazar, P.S.- Ziradei, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 11-02-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126, 115(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on the alleged date and time of occurrence, all the accused persons named in the F.I.R., including this petitioner, assaulted informant and her family members by means of lathi and iron rod. It is further alleged that this petitioner assaulted husband of informant and also tore clothes of daughter of informant and snatched her gold chain and Mangalsutra. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.955 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2025 2/3 behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are agnates and due to dispute over parking of thela and bike a quarrel happened between the parties in which maar-peet took place and both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case between the parties. Doctor has found the injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner to be simple in nature. Petitioner claims clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of injuries sustained by the injured, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Siwan in connection with Ziradei P.S. Case No. 136 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.955 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2025 3/3 Code of Criminal Procedure. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T