Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83323 (PNJ)

ANKIT v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/43699/2024 · 2025-08-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-43699 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ankit State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, Present: SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE 1. petition 17.06.2023 added and Section 346 IPC deleted later on) Station, Sadar Narwana, District Jind. 2. little more than 02 years and 04 months for murder and the implication of the petitioner is based on circumstantial evidence of last seen together. 3. witnesses have been examined, which include the main 43699-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision : Versus Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, Mr. Parvesh Jaglan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) The petitioner, who has no antecedents for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 17.06.2023, under Section 346 IPC (Sections 302, 201, 404 IPC added and Section 346 IPC deleted later on) Sadar Narwana, District Jind. The petitioner is in custody little more than 02 years and 04 months for murder and the implication of the petitioner is based on circumstantial evidence of last seen together. Considering the fact that 12 out of 22 enlisted witnesses have been examined, which include the main IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-43699-2024 Date of decision : 26.08.2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE , Advocate, Deepak Balyan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ( Oral ) has no antecedents, has filed this for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 148 dated 346 IPC (Sections 302, 201, 404 IPC added and Section 346 IPC deleted later on), registered at Police Sadar Narwana, District Jind. The petitioner is in custody since the last about little more than 02 years and 04 months for an offence of murder and the implication of the petitioner is based on circumstantial evidence of last seen together. Considering the fact that 12 out of 22 enlisted witnesses have been examined, which include the main -1- 08.2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondent CHIEF JUSTICE , has filed this dated 346 IPC (Sections 302, 201, 404 IPC , registered at Police about a offence of murder and the implication of the petitioner is based on Considering the fact that 12 out of 22 enlisted witnesses have been examined, which include the main AJAY PRASHER 2025.08.26 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-43699-2024 -2- witnesses, this Court deems it appropriate to release the petitioner on bail, but with stringent conditions. 4. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the trial court/Duty Magistrate, subject to the conditions stipulated in Section 437 (3) Cr.P.C./Section 480 (3) of BNSS, 2023 and following condition: (i) the petitioner shall plant 10 saplings of indigenous plants at a public place and submit proof in that regard by way of photographs before the trial court within a period of 15 days and if there is no such intimation submitted or intimation is found to be incorrect, then the State can move an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. 5. The petition stands allowed. ( SHEEL NAGU ) CHIEF JUSTICE August 26, 2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.08.26 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document