2025:UHC:8433 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/1127/2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Present applicant Sagar, S/o Jogendra Singh is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 02.03.2025, bearing FIR No. 0077 of 2025, registered at P.S. Piran Kaliyar, District Haridwar, wherein the present applicant along with 11 other persons have been implicated and charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 144, 64 of BNS read with Section 3/4 and 16/17 of the POCSO Act and under Section 3, 5, 6, 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and is languishing in jail since 03.03.2025 and charge sheet has already been filed, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. He submits that the victim has not disclosed the name of the applicant in her statement recorded under Section 183 of BNS 2023. He further submits that as per the prosecution, main accused is “Mustaffa” who is in jail. He also submits that other co-accused, namely, Asif and Saddam have already been enlarged on bail by this Court, and, furthermore, the ground of arrest were not given to the applicant at the time of his arrest and the applicant has no previous criminal history. 5. On the other side, Mr. Pal, learned A.G.A. has not disputed this fact that charge sheet has already been filed and other co-accused, named above, have already been enlarged on bail and the 2025:UHC:8433 applicant has no previous criminal history. 6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties, and further taking into consideration that charge sheet has already been filed, and, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant and furthermore the applicant has no previous criminal history, and other co- accused have already been enlarged on bail, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant “Sagar” be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 19.09.2025 Parul 2025:UHC:8433