- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49026 WP No. 23636 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 23636 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI V KAMALAKANNAN S/O VELUNATHAN AGED 40 YEARS R/A NO. TF5, 3RD FLOOR 10TH CROSS, R R NAGAR IDEA HOME BHARATHI PETROL BUNK BANGALORE 560098 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N SURESHA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANK OF BARODA NO 248, 5TH CROSS ROAD 1ST MAIN ROAD, DOMMALUR BANGALORE 560071 REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER 2. SMT K BHARTHI PRIYA W/O KAMALAKANNAN AGE 30 YEARS R/A NO.TF5, 3RD FLOOR 10TH CROSS, R R NAGAR IDEA HOME, BHARATHI PETROL BUNK BANGALORE 560098. SRI. MALIVANNAN S/O PITAMBARAM AGE 50 YEARS Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49026 WP No. 23636 of 2022 NO.13, 5TH CROSS, OIL MILL ROAD LINGARAJAPURAM BANGALORE-560084. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANK TO REGULARIZE THE LOAN ACCOUNT AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANK NOT TO TAKE THE PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY. IF THEY PROCEED FURTHER, THE LOSS AND HARDSHIP CAUSED TO THE PETITIONER CANNOT BE COMPENSATED IN TERMS OF MONEY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent-Bank to regularize the loan account of the petitioner. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49026 WP No. 23636 of 2022 2. Heard Sri N.Suresha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vignesh Shetty, learned Counsel for respondent No.1. 3. It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank that, the petitioner is in default in making payment to the respondent-Bank. 4. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for in this petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE JT/- CT:JL