- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49135 CRP No. 275 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.275 OF 2019 (SC) BETWEEN: 1. M/S. SHREE ARCHANA AUTOMOBILE OLD NO.54, NEW NO.22 AND 23, SHOP NO.6, GROUND FLOOR, "SEETHALAKSHMI COMPLEX", 3RD CROSS, JOURNALIST COLONY, BENGALURU-560 002, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR K.M.E. SOUNDER RAJAN, S/O LATE K.M.E. EKAMBARAM 2. MR. K. M. E. SOUNDER RAJAN S/O LATE K.M.E. EKAMBARAM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PROPRIETOR- M/S. SHREE ARCHANA AUTOMOBILE, OLD NO.54, NEW NO.22 AND 23, SHOP NO.6, GROUND FLOOR, "SEETHALAKSHMI COMPLEX", 3RD CROSS, JOURNALIST COLONY, BENGALURU-560 002 ALSO AT NO.1595, BTM, VIJAYANAGAR EXTENSION, BANGARPET – 563 114 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. G.R.VEDAVENKAMAMBA FOR SRI V B SHIVA KUMAR, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. MR. ANIL KUMAR MITTAL S/O LATE HARIKRISHANMITTAL, Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49135 CRP No. 275 of 2019 AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NAVEEN’S RAJENDRA GARDEN, RAYAPEETAH, CHENNAI-600 014. 2. MR. SANJAY KUMAR MITTAL S/O LATE HARIKRISHANMITTAL, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT B. S. SUNVIEW APARTMENT, NO.6, LlYODS ROAD, 1ST LANE, RAYAPEETAH, CHENNAI-600 014. 3. MRS KUSUM MITTAL W/O SUNIL KUMAR MITTAL, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.78, EAST AND "D" MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGAR 9TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 069. PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER, MR. SUNIL KUMAR MITTAL, S/O LATE HARIKRISHAN MITTAL, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.78, EAST AND "D" MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGAR 9TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 069. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SAMPATH A, ADVOCATE FOR GPA HOLDER OF R1 AND R3) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SMALL CAUSES COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.03.2019 PASSED IN SC.NO.760/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL.SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, AND XXVII ACMM, BANGALORE PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49135 CRP No. 275 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Parties are present with their respective counsel. 2. Compromise Petition is filed under Order 23 Rule CPC is filed signed by the parties and their respective counsels. 3. On enquiry parties have agreed that the contents of the compromise petition depicts the true terms of settlement and they have voluntarily signed the petition. 4. As such, there is no impediment for this Court to dispose of the matter by placing the compromise petition on record. 5. Accordingly, the following: ORDER (i) Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. (ii) Office is directed to pass a modified decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49135 CRP No. 275 of 2019 petition as part of the decree. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR