Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83272 (KAR)

SRI ANTHONY RAJESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

RP/88/2021 · 2025-11-14

Pradeep Singh Yerur, S Sunil Dutt Yadav

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46736-DB RP No. 88 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REVIEW PETITION NO.88 OF 2021 BETWEEN: SRI ANTHONY RAJESH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O.LATE ANTHONY NELSON HOOVER SECOND DIVISION ASSISTANT (NOW UNDER ORDERS OF COMPULSORY RETIREMENT) OFFICE OF THE REVENUE OFFICER RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR SUB-DIVISION RAJARAJESHWRINAGAR ZONE IDEAL HOMES RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR BENGALURU-560 098 R/AT NO.1340, 9TH CROSS OPPOSITE TO JUBILEE SCHOOL VIJINAPURA, BENGALURU-560 016 …PETITIONER (BY SRI T.P.VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRICNIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVEOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE HON'BLE UPA-LOKAYUKTHA KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46736-DB RP No. 88 of 2021 MULTI STORED BUILDING DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY REGISTRAR 3. THE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR (ENQUIRIES-11) KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 4. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R.SQUARE BENGALURU-560 001 5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ADMIN) BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE N.R.SQUARE BENGALURU-560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI VENKATESH S.ARBATTI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 & R-3; SRI PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-4 & R-5) THE REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 12.02.2021 PASSED IN WP.NO.9391/2020 BY TAKING NOTE OF THE ORDER PASSED IN WP.NO. 105359/2019-R.V.JATTANNA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46736-DB RP No. 88 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) Learned counsel for petitioner files a memo for withdrawal, which reads as under: "The petitioner respectfully submits as follows; 1. The above Review Petition has been filed seeking Review of the order dated 12.02.2021 passed in W.P No.9391/2020 only in so far as non consideration of the order passed in W.P No. 105359/2019 - R.V Jattanna Vs. State of Karnataka & Others regarding competence of the Respondent No. 4 in entrusting the enquiry to second respondent. 2. Pursuant to the order the review of which is sought, the petitioner has been reinstated to service and presently working in the establishment of Respondent No.4. 3. The Petitioner learnt that Respondent No.4 is considering the reply of the petitioner to the second show cause notice favourably. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46736-DB RP No. 88 of 2021 In the said circumstances, the petitioner intends to withdraw the above Review Petition with liberty to urge the grounds urged in this Review Petition if the circumstances warrants at a later date. WHEREFORE the petitioner respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit him to withdraw the above Review Petition with liberty to urge the Grounds/Legal Contentions urged in this Review Petition if circumstances warren at the later date, in the interest of justice and equity." In the light of the memo, the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the legal contentions and grounds urged in this petition are kept open. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE LB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2