Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83264 (KAR)

MR. M C RAVI v. MR. G C VEERARAJE URS

WP/19107/2024 · 2025-09-08

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35328 WP No. 19107 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 19107 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MR. M C RAVI S/O LATE CHANNARAJE URS AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO 22, 11TH MAIN, 13TH CROSS, J P NAGAR E-BLOCK, 2ND FLOOR, MYSURU - 570008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H C.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. G C VEERARAJE URS S/O G V CHANNARAJE URS AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT NO 1095, JANATHANAGAR 1ST CROSS, T K LAYOUT 4TH STAGE MYSURU - 570009. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35328 WP No. 19107 of 2024 2. MR M C NAGARAJU S/O LATE CHANNARAJE URS AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO 2346, 28TH MAIN HEBBAL 2ND STAGE NEAR SHANKRANTHI CIRCLE MYSURU - 570016 3. MR M C DINESH S/O LATE CHANNARAJE URS AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO 3418, KOUSTHUBA 20TH D MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE MYSURU - 570017 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT K R NAGAR IN EX NO. 37/2018 DTD 11.07.2024 ON IA NO. 4 FILED U/O XXI RULE 97,98,101 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC PRODUCED AT ANNX-C AS THE SAME IS IMPUGNED PERVERSE AND CAPRICIOUS AND IS LIABLE TO BE SET ASIDE TO DIRECT THE TRIAL COURT DISPOSE TH IA NO. 4 AFRESH BY GIVING AN OPPORTUNITY TO THE PETITIONERCOST OF THE PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35328 WP No. 19107 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER What is called in question is an order passed under Order XXI Rule 97 of the CPC. 2. The order so passed on an application under Order XXI Rule 91 of CPC is, trite, is itself a decree. In that light, the petitioner has to prefer an appeal. 3. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail of such remedy, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 386