CRWP-8007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 111 Husanpreet Kaur and another State of Punjab Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behe 2. are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 to apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to photographs evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P Annexure P 22.07.2025 (Annexure P 3. 4. respondent-State. 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2 8007-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Husanpreet Kaur and another Versus Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Chahit Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 to Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 to apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to photographs evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P Annexure P-4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated .07.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a n to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8007-2025 Decided on:25.07.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their st of respondents No.4 to 7 and their relatives. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent nos.4 to 7. They apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 7. Their marriage certificate and photographs evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P-3 and 4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 5) to respondent no.2. respondents only. , accepts notice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Superintendent of Police, District Mansa ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners . They . Their marriage certificate and 3 and 4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated , accepts notice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Mansa VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.25 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8007 to decide the representation (Annexure P protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitione July 25, 2025 vinod* 8007-2025 to decide the representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shal the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitione , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - 5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES 5) of the petitioners and grant them l not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.25 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document