[2025:RJ-JP:8376] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2728/2025 Mausim S/o Mahmood @ Mota, R/o Jhenjhpuri, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2729/2025 Jaheed S/o Neku, R/o Gadhi Jheel Patti, Police Station Kethwada, District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2730/2025 Yunus S/o Ayub Khan, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Abhaypur, Police Station Kethwada, District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Kumar Jangir Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 25/02/2025 1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No. 191/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwada District Deeg, for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, [2025:RJ-JP:8376] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2728/2025] 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 61(2) (A) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act the petitioners have preferred these anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that recovery of sim cards, mobile phones etc. have already been effected from the possession of other co-accused. The trial of the case will take considerable time and custodial investigation of the accused petitioners is not required. Petitioners are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. Considering the above facts, the bail applications of petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications. 4. I have considered the overall allegations levelled in the FIR and contentions made by the counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the fact that custodial investigation of the present petitioners is not required and the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners are triable by Magistrate, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners, without expressing anything on merits of the case I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail applications of the accused-petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 BNSS. are allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioners- 1. Mausim S/o Mahmood @ Mota, 2. Jaheed S/o Neku, 3. Yunus S/o Ayub Khan, in connection with FIR [2025:RJ-JP:8376] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2728/2025] No.191/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwada District Deeg, they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /11-13