Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26405 WP No. 20566 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 20566 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S CLASSIC VENTURES LLP A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT.
NO. 6787, 4 FLOOR, 17TH MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI Y.C. SANDEEP REDDY SON OF RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AVINASH GOWDA G.S, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY 'THE SECRETARY', GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA SECRETARIAT, ROOM NO. 213, II FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HAVING OFFICE AT.
NO 1/14, 2NDFLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK,
Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26405 WP No. 20566 of 2025
UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU -560 027.
3.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU CITY, KANDAYA BHAVANA, KG ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1. QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 14.12.2023 (ANNEXURE A) PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 - RERA. 2. DIRECTION RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENT NO.3 FROM TAKING ANY COERCIVE STEPS AGAINST THE PETITIONER PURSUANT TO THE SAID IMPUGNED ORDER AND LETTER DATED 29.05.2025 (ANNEXURE B) AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal which reads as hereunder:
"It is most respectfully prayed that the Petitioner in the present writ petition may kindly be permitted to
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26405 WP No. 20566 of 2025
withdraw this present petition with liberty to approach the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal and the period of litigation spent before this Hon'ble Court may be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation at the time of filing the appeal in the Appellate Tribunal the interest of justice and equity."
In light of the same, petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Time spent before this Court may be urged before the Authority if the objection for limitation is raised and may be taken note of by the Authority appropriately.
Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE
DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13