Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:116372 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25672 of 2024 Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra Gupta And 6 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Madhavendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shiv Singh Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the informant is no more, his son is also died but grandson Bhanu Pratap Singh has moved application to implead him as opposite party no.2 and Bhanu Pratap Singh, grandson of the informant has been impleaded as opposite party no.2. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 16.06.2009; cognizance/summoning order dated 17.01.2012, bailable warrant dated 01.06.2024 as well as entire proceedings of Case No.601 of 2012 (State of U.P. Vs. Ram Chandra Gupta and others) arising out of Case Crime No.220 of 2009, under Sections 147, 148, 308, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Fatehpur, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Fatehpur in terms of compromise dated 06.10.2009. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the applicants next submits that the injured has received injuries but parties have amicably settled their dispute and compromised the matter. Learned counsel for the applicants next submits that during investigation, applicants, informant and injured compromised the matter and informant has filed affidavit in this regard but Investigating Officer has not considered the affidavit and submitted charge-sheet. Since informant is no more and grandson Bhanu Pratap Singh has compromised the matter with applicants, there is no need to keep the proceeding pending against the applicants. The compromised deed dated 17.03.2025 is filed as Annexure SA-1 with the supplementary affidavit. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 does not dispute the correctness of the facts. 6. Accordingly, it is provided that the parties shall appear before the court below along with a photocopy of the compromise deed and certified copy of this order on the next date fixed. It is, therefore, expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of the parties and compromise entered into between the parties and pass an appropriate order to that effect within next four weeks. It shall be open to the applicants to file a fresh application U/S 482 at that stage for the relief sought herein. 7. In view of the above, the present application is disposed of. 8. For the period of eight weeks, no coercive measure shall be taken against the applicants. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 SKD Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad