Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:135119 Court No. - 85 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8854 of 2025 Petitioner :- Veerpal And 6 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Kant Yadav,Sant Ram Nigam,Vivek Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed to set aside the
Judgment and Order dated 13.08.2024 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Etah in Criminal Revision No. 163 of 2023 (Veerpal and 6 Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another) Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District-Etah as well as summoning order dated 14.06.2023 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, District-Etah in Complaint Case No. 13013 of 2022 (Hiralal Vs. Veerpal and others) under Sections 323, 504, 379 IPC, Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District-Etah pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, District- Etah as well as further proceedings of Complaint Case No. 13013 of 2022 (Hiralal Vs. Veerpal and others) under Sections 323, 504, 379 IPC, Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District-Etah, pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, District-Etah, may kind stayed. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the
facts of the case, at this stage, it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the petitioners. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court. Only in cases where the Court finds that there has been failure of justice or misuse of judicial mechanism or procedure, sentence or order was not correct, this power may be exercised to prevent the abuse of process of miscarriage of justice. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is refused. However, in view of the submissions, it is provided that in case the petitioners move an application for discharge at an appropriate
stage through counsel within 30 days, the same shall be disposed of by the Trial Court by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within two weeks thereafter. For a period of 30 days or till the disposal of the discharge application, whichever is earlier, no coercive measures shall be taken against the petitioners in the aforesaid case. With the aforesaid direction, this petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 11.8.2025 Shivani Digitally signed by :- SHIVANI SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad