Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8321 (RAJ)

DR JAYSHRI PURKAYASTH v. STATE OF RAJ AND ANR

CW/12385/2009 · 2025-03-17

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11794] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12385/2009 Dr. Jayshri Purkayasth W/o Dr. Harish Bafna, D-117, Krishna Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Medical And Health Services Esi, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, Addl. GC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/03/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents to accept the voluntary retirement of the petitioner. 2. At the outset, it has been apprised by learned counsel for the respondents that instant petition was filed by the petitioner with the aforesaid prayer in the year 2009 and at the relevant time her age was 58 years. 3. Learned counsel for the State-respondents submits that, during pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner has already retired after attaining the age of superannuation i.e., 60 years. Learned counsel submits that, hence under the changed circumstances, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. [2025:RJ-JP:11794] (2 of 2) [CW-12385/2009] 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. All applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/45