Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83189 (PNJ)

SUNIL KUMAR v. PUNJAB STATE TH COLLECTOR GURDASPUR PUNJAB

RFA/2565/2016 · 2025-04-04

Anil Kshetarpal

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, SUNIL KUMAR PUNJAB STATE THROUGH COLLECTOR, GURDASPUR CORAM: Present: ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. Court in PUNJAB V. BHAN SINGH AND ORS. (Regular First Appeal No. 641 2016 (O&M) 2. disposed of. 04.04. 2025 Poonam Sharma IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, AT CHANDIGARH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2565 OF 2016 RESERVED ON: PRONOUNCED ON SUNIL KUMAR VERSUS PUNJAB STATE THROUGH COLLECTOR, GURDASPUR CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. R.D. Bawa, Advocate Mr. Samuel Gill, Advocate Mr. Rishabh Rana, Advocate Mr. Randhir Bawa, Advocate Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate Mr. Neeraj Kaler, Advocate Mr. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Himani Kapila, Advocate Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate Mr. Narinder Kumar Vadehra, Advocate Mr. Sushil Saini, Advocate Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate Ms. Ravinder Kaur Manaise, Advocate for the landowner (s). Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for PUDA. *** ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. For orders, see a separate detailed order of even date passed by this Court in HOUSE & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (PUDA) PUNJAB V. BHAN SINGH AND ORS. (Regular First Appeal No. 641 2016 (O&M). The miscellaneous application( disposed of. 04.04. 2025 Poonam Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2565 OF 2016 (O&M) RESERVED ON: 18.03.2025 PRONOUNCED ON: 04.04.2025 APPELLANT(s) PUNJAB STATE THROUGH COLLECTOR, GURDASPUR AND OTHER RESPONDENT(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Himani Kapila, Advocate Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate r Vadehra, Advocate Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate Ms. Ravinder Kaur Manaise, Advocate Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for PUDA. For orders, see a separate detailed order of even date passed by this URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (PUDA) PUNJAB V. BHAN SINGH AND ORS. (Regular First Appeal No. 641 of The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, shall stand (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No :Yes/No For orders, see a separate detailed order of even date passed by this URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (PUDA) of s) pending, if any, shall stand POONAM SHARMA 2025.04.19 21:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document