- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45323 WP No. 11084 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 11084 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MRS. LALITHAMMA W/O LATE GANGARANEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS PRESENTLY R/AT HUTHRI VILLAGE HUTRIGOWDA HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI P.C. NARASIMHAIAH, ADV.) AND: 1. MR. H.C. SHIVARAMAIAH S/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS PRESENTLY R/AT HALUVAGILU VILLGE, HUTRIDURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT. 2. MRS. JAYARATHNAMMA W/O SRI H.C. SHVIARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT HALUVAGILU VILLGE HUTRIDURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT. 3. MRS. KALAPNA W/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.5191, TOWER 5, 19TH FLOOR PRESTIFE WEST WOOD BINNYOPET, GOPALAPURA BANAGLORE - 560 023. Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45323 WP No. 11084 of 2024 4. MRS. YASHODAMMA W/O RANGAPPA @ GUDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT HALUVAGILU VILLGE HITRIDURGA HOBLI KUNGIAL TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT. 5. MR. JAYANNA S/O LATE UGRAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 6. MRS. SAROJAMMA W/O SRI SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 7. PRABHUDEVA S/O LATE URGRAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO.5, 6 AND 7 ARE PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.3935 8THC ROSS, GAYATHRINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 021. 8. LASKHMAMA W/O SRI BOREGOWDA D/O ALTE CHIKKAKEMPEGOWDA PRESENTLY RESIIDNG AT SANTEPETE HUTHRIDURGA HOBLI, KINGILA TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT. SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES. a. MRS. LEELAVATHI @ NEELAMMA W/O LATE BASALINGEGOWDA AGEDA BOUT 56 YEARS. b. MRS. NANDIN W/O SRI LOKESH D/O LTE BASAVAINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45323 WP No. 11084 of 2024 c. MR. ANIL S/O LATE BASAVALINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. THE RESPONDENTS NO.8 (a) TO (c) ARE PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SNATHEPETE VILLGE HUTHRIDURGA HOBLI KUNGIAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT. d. MRS. PREMA @ PUTTAHTAYAMMA W/O SRI DASEGOWDA D/O LATE BOREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. THE RESPONDENTS NO.8(a) TO (d) ARE PERSETNLY RESIDING AT NO.48 1ST MAIN ROAD, 7THC ROSS CHANDRASHEKAR EXENSION SHREDADAKAVAL BANGALORE - 560 091. e. MRS. LASKAHMAMMA W/O LATE SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. f. MR. JGADEESHKUMAR S/O LATE SHIVAVKUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YERS. THE RESPONDENT NO.8(e) AND 8(f) ARE PRESENTELY RESDING AT SANTHEPETE VILLGE HUTRIDURGA HOBLI KUNGIALTALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT. g. MRS. H.S. JAYANTH W/O SRI LOKESH D/O LATE SHIVAKUAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS PREENTLY RESIDING AT THATTKERE VILLGE CHIKKAMALAVADI POST - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45323 WP No. 11084 of 2024 SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANGARA DISTRICT. h. MR. H.S. AKHILA W/O SRI KISHOREGOWDA D/O LATE SHIVAKUAMRA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS PREENTLY RESIDING AT HALAGONAHALLI VILLAGE KOTHAGERE HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT. 9. MR. NAGARJUNA S/O ALTE CHIKKANRAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.135 NEW NO.102, KADEMANE VRUSHABHAVATHI NAGAR KAMAKAHSIPALYA MAIN ROAD BANGALORE - 560 079. 10. MRS. CHIATRADEVI W/O SRI MOHAN G.H AGED ABOUT 45 YERS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.2069 1STMAIN ROAD, JUDICIAL LAYOUT 5TH CROSS, YELAHANKA UPANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 064. 11. MR. KARUNADEVI W/O SRI MOHAN KUMAR M.G AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.135 NEW NO.102, KADEMANE VURSHABHVATHI ANGAR KAMAKSHIPALYA MAIN ROAD BANGALORE - 560 079. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTILCE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO DISPOSE OFF THE IA NO. 1/2016 IN OS NO. 02/2016 BY FIXING THE TIME AND TO DISPOSE OFF THE ABOVE SAID SUIT IN OS NO. 02/2016 AT THE EARLIEST. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45323 WP No. 11084 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER 1. Matter called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. This Court on 31.10.2025, having taken note that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner has passed a peremptory order finally granting time to comply office objections with an observation that if office objections are not complied by the next date of hearing, petition shall be dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Even as on this date, office objections are not complied and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE DN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8