[2025:RJ-JP:20092] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6535/2014 M/s Suman Enterprises Through Proprietor Smt Suman Lata, Wife Of Sh. Lakho Mal, 66 B/c-2B, Janak Puri, New Delhi - 58. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Ltd., Registered Office At Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur Through Managing Director. 2. Regional Manager, Riico Ltd., Bhiwadi Unit Ii, Ricco Rest House Road, Ricco Chowk, Bhiwadi, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.R. M. Bairwa for Mr.M. K. Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr.Sandeep Taneja, AAG with Mr.Aditya Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 13/05/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is therefore humbly prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to admit and allow this writ petition, relevant record may kindly called for and be perused and by an appropriate writ, order or direction; Declare the Annexures 2 and 3 illegal, quashed and set aside, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner, if during the pendency of the writ petition, by coercive action of the Respondent, petitioner is dispossed from the industry/ industrial Plot No.G1-136 at [2025:RJ-JP:20092] (2 of 2) [CW-6535/2014] Chopanki, possession of the same may be restored to him. Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deem just and proper be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the respondents not to take any coercive action against the petitioner. 3. No interim order is existing in favour of the petitioner. 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents apprised this Court that the respondent-RIICO vide order dated 24.06.2024 has cancelled the allotment of Plot No.G1-136 situated at Industrial Area Chopakni. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to continue with this writ petition and this petition has become infructuous. 6. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, this petition is rendered as infructuous. The instant writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to assail the validity of the order dated 24.06.2024 before the appropriate forum of law. 7. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /38