FAO-7205-201 IN T (222) Harpreet Sing Rajinder Kau CORAM: Present: LISA GILL 1. for setting a Judge, Pathan 04.07.2014, w Marriage Act motion in t respectively. 2. was passed: 2017 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH et Singh Versus r Kaur HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LIS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALO **** None. **** ILL, J. This appeal was filed in October ting aside decision dated 18.08.201 Pathankot, allowing application seekin 014, whereby, decree of divorce u ge Act, 1955 was granted. Notice in in the appeal was issued on ively. Perusal of the file reveals that ssed: “Learned counsel for th that in pursuance of settleme parties before the Mediation an Court on 17.07.2023, the partie Section 13-B of the Hindu Ma Court of jurisdiction at Pathank pending in view of the past hist prayer was granted by the Di petition under Section 13-B of order dated 04.07.2014 and the order dated 18.08.2017 on the ap 1 NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH FAO-7205-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 14.01.2025 ……Appellant ……Respondent LISA GILL ALOK JAIN ctober 2017, with a delay of 23 days, 8.2017 passed by learned District seeking setting aside of order dated rce under Section 13-B of Hindu ice in the application and notice of on 01.03.2018 and 04.02.2019 on 04.08.2023, following order r the applicant/appellant submits lement entered into between the n and Conciliation Centre of this arties would file a petition under Marriage Act in the competent hankot. The present appeal be kept history of the case where similar e District Judge, Pathankot in a of the Hindu Marriage Act vide the said order was set aside vide he application under Section 151 1 &M) 2025 days, strict ated indu ce of 2019 order its the his der ent ept lar a ide ide PARUL 2025.01.17 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document FAO-7205-201 3. matter was ta on behalf of t that the appel 4. dismissed in d January 14 Parul 2017 (O&M) CPC filed by the respondent-wif preferred against the said order In the interest of justice, a In the meanwhile, parti appropriate step in furtherance before the Mediation and Concil Thereafter, none appeared on be was taken up on 05.09.2024. Today ag alf of the appellant, neither is the resp appellant is no longer interested in pu Appeal along with pending ed in default and for non-prosecution 4, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable:- 2 wife. The present appeal has been rder dated 18.08.2017. ce, adjourned to 18.01.2024. parties, if so advised, may take ance of the compromise effected nciliation Centre of this Court.” on behalf of the appellant when the day again, there is no representation e respondent represented. It appears d in pursuing the matter. nding application is accordingly ution. (LISA GILL) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE asoned:- Yes/No Yes/No 2 een ake ted n the ation pears ingly PARUL 2025.01.17 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document