Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83142 (KAR)

MR SHANKARALINGEGOWDA S K v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23211/2024 · 2025-10-23

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41857 WP No. 23211 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 23211 OF 2024 (LB-ELE) BETWEEN: 1. MR SHANKARALINGEGOWDA S K C/O KEMPEGOWDA AGED 41 YEARS NO 64, DEVIRAMMA NILAYA MULUKATTE GRAMA MULUKATTE POST NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA JILLE KASABA HOBALLI MULKATTE, MANDYA 571 432 2. MRS CHANDRAKALA N W/O N C MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT 146 PADUVALAPATTANA ROAD NAGAMANGALA NAGAMANGALA MANDYA 571 432 3. MR REHANA C/O ABDUL RAUF AGED 46 YEARS MANDYA ROAD HANEEF MOHALLA NAGAMANGALA MANDYA-571 432 4. MRS. SOUMYA W/O M THIRUMALAIAH AGED 42 YEARS, UPPARAHALLI MANDYA-571 432 Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41857 WP No. 23211 of 2024 5. MR. MANJUNATHA P S/O PARAMASHIVAIAH AGED 38 YEARS, TOLALI MANDYA-571432 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SANDHYA U PRABHU., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT VIKASA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENAGALURU-560 001 2. THE TAHASILDAR/ELECTION OFFICER ELECTION OF PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT NAGAMANGALA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL NAGAMANGALA, MANDYA-571 432 3. THE NAGAMANGALA TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER NAGAMANGALA, MANDYA-571 432 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.H.K.KENCHE GOWDA, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE CALENDAR OF EVENTS AS PER ORDER NUMBER ELN (2) C.R 06/2024-25 DTD. 14.08.2020 ISSUED BY R-2 PRODUCED AT ANNX-G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41857 WP No. 23211 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Smt.Sandhya U Prabhu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous. 2. The submission is noted. 3. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5