Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8313 (ALL)

M/S KUNWAR DHEER SINGH BKO v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/1214/2025 · 2025-01-24

Piyush Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:12575 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1214 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Kunwar Dheer Singh Bko Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Pratap Singh,Shiv Sagar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel raises a preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that against the impugned order, the petitioner has equally, efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said fact. In view of the above as well as the judgements of the Apex Court in United Bank of India Vs. Satyawati Tondon & Others [(2010) 8 SCC 110] (paragraph no. 43), Radha Krishan Industries Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others [(2021) 6 SCC 771] (paragraph nos. 27.3 and 27.5) and Varimadugu Obi Reddy Vs. B. Sreenivasulu & Others [(2023) 2 SCC 168] (paragraph no. 36), the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. Certified copy of the impugned order, if any, may be returned to the petitioner after obtaining a true copy of the same. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Amit Mishra Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad