Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83109 (ALL)

VIRENDRA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/26687/2025 · 2025-08-07

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134768 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26687 of 2025 Petitioner :- Virendra Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Singh,Rajendra Prasad Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "1. Issue a writ order of direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the Respondent No 1 to 4 to restrain the Respondent No 5 not to act upon illegal measurement of chak marg situated in Arazi No 1038 in arbitrary manner without any notice to the petitioner while after measurement order of Diss- possession passed with the compensation and expenditure same has been complied in the year of 2020 inspite of this Respondent No 5 on the connivance of chak holder Arazi No 1036 namely Jang Bahadur Yadav son of Parashuram to increase his area of the said said chak area of his Arazi No 1036 so complaint/representation dated 07.07.025 send to Respondent No 1 and 2 through Registered post and submitted the same before Respondent No 2 to this writ petition." From perusal of prayer made in the writ petitioner, it appears to be a private dispute between the petitioner and respondent no.5. No case for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is made out. Writ petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 8.8.2025 SK Goswami Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad