Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8310 (MAD)

M/S.Avigna Amaira Pvt.Ltd, v. State rep.by, The Superintendent of Police,

WP Crl./1694/2025 · 2026-07-13

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(Crl).No.1694 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.(Crl).No.1694 of 2025 M/s.Avigna Amaira Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Mr. K.Manimaran S/o K.Kannayiram Having its office at No.1822, 13th Main Road, I Block, Anna Nagar, Chennai – 600040. … Petitioner vs. 1.State represented by, The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District. 2.State represented by, The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Denkanikottai Sub-Division, Krishnagiri District. 3.State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Kelamangalam Police Station, Krishnagiri District. … Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent police authorities to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 18.06.2025 and to provide adequate and effective police protection to the 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(Crl).No.1694 of 2025 petitioner for carrying out fencing and other lawful developmental activities in the petition mentioned property. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Praveenkumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for a direction, directing the respondents/police authorities to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 18.06.2025 and to provide adequate and effective police protection to the petitioner for carrying out fencing and other lawful developmental activities in the petition mentioned property. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. The learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submits that already there were complaints as against the petitioner, in which the FIR came to be registered as against the petitioner. That apart, there was proceedings under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(Crl).No.1694 of 2025 4. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the writ petition, the 3rd respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, after issuance of notice to the petitioner and counter parties, if any and to dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition (Criminal) is disposed of. No costs. 13.07.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No dm To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Denkanikottai Sub-Division, Krishnagiri District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Kelamangalam Police Station, Krishnagiri District. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(Crl).No.1694 of 2025 G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN , J. dm W.P.(Crl).No.1694 of 2025 13.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis