KAJAL KUMAR DAS ALIAS KAJAL DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2283/2025 · 2025-07-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8310 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8310 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:18494] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.2283 of 2025
------ Kajal Kumar Das @ Kajal Das, aged about 20 years, son of Lakshman Das @ Laxman Das, resident of Village Khirwatari, near Hanuman Mandir, P.O. and P.S. Devipur, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... …. Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated- 09-07-2025 I.A. No.7997 of 2025
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant bail application.
Since, the hearing of instant bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands rejected being infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2283 of 2025
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.08 of 2025 registered under Section 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) and 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 B, 66 C, 66 D and 84 C of the Information Technology Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and one mobile phone and two SIM Cards have been recovered from his possession and he has defrauded the victim Lalsu Prajapati to the tune of Rs.12,505/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing
attention of this Court towards para-16 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and that he will transfer the amount allegedly defrauded to the bank account of the aforesaid victim without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.01.2025 as is evident from para-15 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transferring Rs.12,505/- to the account of victim Lalsu Prajapati without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum Special Judge, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.08 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/