Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83099 (ORI)

DUSMANTA SAHOO v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/8948/2025 · 2025-11-10

Gourishankar Satapathy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.8948 of 2025 Dusmanta Sahoo … Petitioner Mr. A. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. A. Pradhan, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 10.11.2025 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Dhenkanal PR Case No.10 of 2024-25 corresponding to CT(Special) NDPS Case No.08 of 2024 pending in the file of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhenkanal for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, on the main allegation of transporting 80Kgs of Contraband Ganja in a white color Tata Indigo Car bearing Regd. No.OR-19J-8482. 3. Heard, Mr. Anirudha Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Pradhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. 4. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and p. 2 regard being had to the seizure of 80Kgs of Contraband Ganja, which is well above the commercial quantity from the vehicle allegedly in occupation of the petitioner and his consequent failure to satisfy the conditions of Sec.37 of NDPS Act and keeping in view the failure of the petitioner to dispute about his involvement in NCB crime no.3/NCB/KPL of 2022 for commission of similar type of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands rejected. In view of the alternative oral prayer as advanced for the petitioner, trial be expedited, if there is no other legal impediment. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. 7. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. (G. Satapathy) Judge Jayakrushna