Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.12644 of 2025
1. Sita Jena
2. Madana Mohan Jena … Petitioners Mr. L. Mishra, Advocate
-versus- State of Orissa …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panda, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
ORDER 13.11.2025
01.
1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.2095 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned JMFC(O), Bhubaneswar, arising out of Balianta P.S. Case No.490 of 2025 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 341, 323, 294 and 34 of IPC read with Section 4 of DP Act.
3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that Petitioner No.2 (Madan Mohan Jena) has only been charge sheeted and the case at hand the provision under Section 35(3) of BNSS has been resorted to by the p. 2 Investigating Agency in respect of that Petitioner No.2.
4. In view of the same, since there is no imminent threat of arrest, the ABLAPL accordingly stands disposed of in respect of Petitioner No.2.
5. So far as the ABLAPL in respect Petitioner No.1 is concerned, the ABLAPL has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the ABLAPL in respect of Petitioner No.1 stands disposed of.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Jina