HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 28520 of 2025 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and Sri Shashi Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2. 2. This petition has been filed by the applicants for quashing the cognizance/summoning order dated 26.5.2020 passed by Special Judge POCSO Act, Sambhal and also the proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No.14 of 2020, arising out of case crime No.155 of 2020, under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Actd, as well as charge sheet No.95 of 2020 relating to police station Gunnaur, District Sambhal. 3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that parties have amicably compromised their dispute, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court below. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the Court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the parties to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 7. Original copy of compromise, if filed before this Court along with the present application, be returned to the learned counsel for applicants, as per Rules of Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Prakash Pandey, Dharmendra Kumar Patel Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shashi Kumar Tiwari Krishna Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 8. With aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of. September 18, 2025 RKM. NA528 No. 28520 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad