Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8309 (AP)

Jarina Begum, v. Bank of India,

WP/3911/2019 · 2025-07-13

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010089012019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 3911 OF 2019 Between: Jarina Begum, W/o Md.Shariff, Aged about 45 years, R/o D.No. 76-16-27/5B, Bhavanipuram, Vijayawada-12. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M/s. Bank of India, rep. by its Chief Manager, Sridevi Complex, J.D Hospital Road, Governorpet, Vijaywada-2. 2. The Authorized Officer, M/s. Bank of India, D.No.27-21-39, Kaleswarao Road, Governorpet, Vijayawada. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the notice Ref.No.VJA:DK;18-19 Dt. 18-02-2019 issued by the respondent No.2 to hold the e-auction on 26-03-2019 against the property shown in the schedule being an extent of 41 sq.yards at D.No.40-20-35, Patamata, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation as illegal, and also violative of Articles 14, and 300-A of the constitution of India beside being in violation of the SARFAESI Act and Rules framed there under, and set aside the same, directing the respondents not to conduct sale. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all proceedings in pursuance of notice Ref.No.VJA:DK:18- 19 18-02-2019 issued by the 2nd respondent including e-auction to be held on | 26-03-2019 against the property shown in the schedule, an extent of 41 yards bearing D.No.40-20-35, Patamata, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. S. R. ANJANEYALU(Not Present) Counsel for the Respondents: — The Court made the following order: to Dt; sq. APHC010089012019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Sr.No:-6 [3483] AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 3911 of 2019 Jarina Begum ...Petitioner Vs. M/s. Bank of India and another ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner: NONE Advocate for Respondents: CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUStiCE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 14*'’ July, 2025 PC : None for the petitioner. Even on the previous date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution . No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAF! ASSISTANT registrar //TRUE COPY// ON OFFICER SE' To, 1. One CC to Sri V. S. R. Anjaneyalu, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CD Copies ssb HIGH COURT DATED:14/07/2025 ORDER WP No.3911 OF 2019 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS