SRI BALACHANDRA H v. THE REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
WP/14449/2023 · 2025-07-10
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83087 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83087 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26356 WP No. 14449 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 14449 OF 2023 (CS-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. BALACHANDRA H, S/O NARAYANA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.2-27, HOSALIKE HOUSE, GUTTIGAARU VILLAGE AND POST, SULIYA TALUK, D.K.- 574 218, PRESIDENT OF M/S SOUBHAGYA VIKALACHETHANA PATTINA SAHAKARA SANGHA, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, SULIYA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKSHITH KUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, OFFICE AT NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD, VASANT NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 052.
2.
THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, URBAN BANKS DIVISIONS, SAHAKARI MAHAL, MISSION STREET, MANGALORE – 575 001.
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26356 WP No. 14449 of 2023
3.
THE JOINT REGISTAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, OFFICE AT NO.1, ALI ASKER ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 052.
4.
M/S. SOUBHAGYA VIKALACHETHANA PATTINA SAHAKARA SANGHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, SULIYA TALUK, D.K.-574 218. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.A.S.HARISH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO. 2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 19.10.2023 AS PER ANNEXURE - A AND B AND IMPLEMENT THE DIRECTION AS PER NOTICE DATED 16.11.2022 VIDE NO.RCS/UBC-5/5/DU.A/2022-23 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-C WITHIN A PERIOD OF 2 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF THIS ORDER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL FOR NON- PROSECUTION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26356 WP No. 14449 of 2023
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Despite the order dated 13.06.2025, process-fee has not been paid.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27