Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83083 (KAR)

M/S SAHARA PRIME CITY LIMITED v. M/S MYCON CONSTRUCTION LTD

WP/6776/2017 · 2025-08-18

D K Singh, Venkatesh Naik T

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32026-DB WP No. 6776 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T WRIT PETITION NO. 6776 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M/S SAHARA PRIME CITY LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SAHARA INDIA CENTRE, 2 KAPOORHALA COMPLEX, ALIGANJ, LUCKNOW - 226024 REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SRI MR DWARAKANATH GOVIND …PETITIONER (BY M/s SAHARA PRIME CITY LIMITED, (ABSENT)) AND: 1. M/S MYCON CONSTRUCTION LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT INDUSTRY HOUSE, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE - 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR MALPANI …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ARUN KUMAR K., SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. M.V.SUNDARARAMAN, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 13.12.2016 VIDE ANNEX-A PASSED BY THE HON'BLE ARBITRATOR ARBITRATION CENTRE - BANGALORE ON 13.12.2016 IN A.C.NO.100/16(CMP Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32026-DB WP No. 6776 of 2017 - 95/15) BEING ARBITRARY, CAPRICIOUS AND BEING IN VIOLATION OF PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) As could be seen from the order dated 02.03.2023, the earlier counsel representing the petitioner has retired from the case. Thereafter, the petitioner has neither appeared before this Court nor represented by any counsel. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48